Prototype company example

Johnson&Johnson

Johnson&Johnson’s legal filings cover issues missing from the sustainability messages reviewed.

Read the findings ↓

Higher value = more gaps detected Lower value = greater alignment

Illumination Index

12/22


Findings ↓

Research detail ↓

Sources ↓

Johnson & Johnson’s environmental reporting, outside checks of selected data, and legal records about talc litigation and opioid settlements.


What was reviewed:

What this means for you:

An outside reviewer may check selected figures without assessing whether a report covers every important issue. Check what the review actually included.



Details behind the findings

Outside review

Selected sustainability information was checked by independent organizations.

Separate legal records

The study also examined talc litigation and opioid settlements.


What The Illumination Index Found

The study identified climate targets approved by the Science Based Targets initiative, an organization that checks targets against climate science. It also identified reviews of selected information by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and ERM Certification and Verification Services.

1


Outside organizations checked selected information.

Findings

What this means:

Approval of a climate target and review of reported data are different checks. Neither automatically establishes that a report covers every relevant issue.


Talc litigation appeared in separate legal records.

The study identified talc-related legal proceedings in public records that were not discussed in the selected sustainability messages it reviewed.

2

What this means:

Allegations, proposed settlements and court decisions mean different things. Reporting a legal issue does not mean treating every allegation as proven.


Opioid settlements added information beyond environmental performance.

3

The study also considered opioid settlements in public records when assessing which issues the selected sustainability messages addressed.

What this means:

Sustainability reporting can cover environmental, social and governance issues—often shortened to ESG. Product safety, public health and company oversight can matter as well as emissions.


How to read the research detail

These are the original names used in the research. Each indicator is a question applied to the same selected messages and records. The explanation below each name tells you what was checked. The number records what the researcher found in those materials.

Some labels need their explanation. “Third-party verification” checks whether outside support is missing or described inaccurately; a higher value does not mean more outside review.

0 - Not detected

1 - Partially detected

2 - Clearly detected

Vagueness
Checks whether the message explains what the claim means.
1
Lack of quantification
Checks for numbers, units and a starting year that help readers measure progress.
1
Selective disclosure
Checks whether information in the reports is left out of the public messages selected for this study.
1
Future deflection
Checks whether future promises are explained alongside what is happening now.
1
Third-party verification
Checks whether claims of outside support are accurate and backed by evidence.
1
Cross-platform inconsistency
Checks whether the company gives consistent information across the materials reviewed.
1
How the claims compare with records
Emissions trajectory vs. reduction claims
How do reported emissions compare with the company's reduction goals?
1
Carbon neutrality and net zero claim integrity
Which emissions does the climate promise cover, and how will they be reduced or balanced?
1
Omission of material controversies
Do the selected messages address relevant lawsuits or regulatory issues?
2
ESG ratings volatility
Do the messages reflect changes in outside environmental assessments?
1
TCFD completeness
Does the report explain who oversees climate issues, its plans, the risks it faces and how it measures progress?
1

ESG means environmental, social and governance. TCFD means Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, a framework for reporting climate related business risks and opportunities. Indicator values describe the original coding behind the overall result.

References

Johnson & Johnson. (2025, June 11). 2024 Health for Humanity report. https://healthforhumanityreport.jnj.com/2024/_assets/downloads/johnson-johnson-2024-health-for-humanity-report.pdf

Johnson & Johnson. (2026, February 11). Form 10-K: Annual report for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0000200406/000020040626000016/jnj-20251228.htm

Johnson & Johnson. (2025, February 13). Form 10-K: Annual report for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://s203.q4cdn.com/636242992/files/doc_financials/2024/q4/Form-10-K-2024-as-filed-13Feb2025.pdf

Johnson & Johnson. (n.d.). Environmental sustainability. https://www.jnj.com/our-societal-impact/global-environmental-sustainability

J&J MedTech. (n.d.). Sustainability. https://www.jnjmedtech.com/en-US/service/healthsystems/sustainability

Johnson & Johnson [@jnj]. (2024, December 20). Our commitment to creating a healthier planet goes hand in hand with our mission to impact health for humanity [Instagram post]. Instagram.

Science Based Targets initiative. (2025). Target dashboard: Johnson & Johnson. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/target-dashboard

Net0Tracker. (2025). Johnson & Johnson. https://net0tracker.com/corporates.html/Johnson%20&%20Johnson/

InfluenceMap. (2025). Johnson & Johnson. LobbyMap. https://lobbymap.org/EN/company/Johnson-Johnson

Sustainability Magazine. (2026, February 5). How J&J leads healthcare innovation through sustainability. Sustainability Magazine. https://sustainabilitymag.com/news/johnson-johnson-healthcare-innovation-sustainability

Previous
Previous

ExxonMobil · 11/22

Next
Next

Meta · 14/22